<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The One Minute Case For Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/</link>
	<description>The One Minute Case is a new collaborative blog which will present a brief argument about a controversial issue that can be read in about a minute. The goal is to publish one case per day. You can read the cases to learn something new about an issue or use them as a source for longer arguments of your own.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/#comment-12907</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/#comment-12907</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing excellent cases.

We took the liberty to translate this one. Hope you don't mind.

http://www.meervrijheid.nl/index.php?pagina=1929</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing excellent cases.</p>
<p>We took the liberty to translate this one. Hope you don&#8217;t mind.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.meervrijheid.nl/index.php?pagina=1929" rel="nofollow">http://www.meervrijheid.nl/index.php?pagina=1929</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/#comment-6366</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/#comment-6366</guid>
		<description>Quote: "Attacking advertising solely for appealing to emotions is as silly as criticizing a painting or a movie for appealing to the viewers’ emotion rather than presenting a dry, factual account."

Wrong. If we don't like the emotions evoked by a painting or movie, we can usually leave the place where it is shown. Often, we paid to experience the painting or movie in the first place. Advertising, however, is designed to be visible from a place where you have to go, and you cannot choose to leave it. You can look away, but that may be hard if you are looking around in boredom during your activity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: &#8220;Attacking advertising solely for appealing to emotions is as silly as criticizing a painting or a movie for appealing to the viewers’ emotion rather than presenting a dry, factual account.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wrong. If we don&#8217;t like the emotions evoked by a painting or movie, we can usually leave the place where it is shown. Often, we paid to experience the painting or movie in the first place. Advertising, however, is designed to be visible from a place where you have to go, and you cannot choose to leave it. You can look away, but that may be hard if you are looking around in boredom during your activity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Huang</title>
		<link>http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Huang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>What if I argue that advertising is visual/audio/mental pollution? Surely if it is, then it can be dealt with in a similar manner to free-market environmentalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if I argue that advertising is visual/audio/mental pollution? Surely if it is, then it can be dealt with in a similar manner to free-market environmentalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminute.rationalmind.net/advertising/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>I think it's important to differentiate between what I call advertising, which aims to inform consumers about a company's product, and what I call marketing, which aims to promote brand loyalty.  The first is essential, and the second has dubious benefits for the general public.

Advertisers often aim to create dissatisfaction, and then present their problem as a solution to this dissatisfaction.  Many television commercials primarily aim to create positive associations with the product they are marketing.  Unfortunately, more often than not, buying the product that is being marketed will not resolve your dissatisfaction.  Nor will it necessarily help you live a happier life.

One of the worst consequences of marketing is that it contributes to interpersonal economic competition, also known as "keeping up with the Jones's".  I became a little less of a libertarian yesterday when I read this article in the American Prospect:

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=why_we_dont_vacation_like_the_french

I am not suggesting that we place any kind of restriction on marketing.  I am suggesting that we promote general awareness of its dangers, and promote skepticism in the general public.

"Perhaps the most classic example of granfalloon tactics in the commercial world is the macho designation of being either a "Chevy Man" or a "Ford Man" that the two automotive companies were happy to foster. For decades -- and in many parts of the U.S. still -- a key aspect of many men's self-definition was the brand of truck they drove: Ford or Chevy."

http://www.sixwise.com/newsletters/06/06/25/people_who_drive_silver_or_blue_cars_should_not_read_this.htm

This is just one example of the manipulative tactics used by marketers.  Marketing is a rare example of a free market occupation that does not create any wealth for the general public.  Instead, marketers capitalize on stupidity and present false solutions.  By teaching people to be wary of the influence of marketing, they will be able to make better decisions for themselves.  One more quote from Brian Vaszily:

"PLEASE remember the First Real Rule of Marketing -- the key secret of those who seek to control your beliefs and habits in order to take your money, your votes, your time or whatever else it is they desire from you -- is that nobody believes they can be manipulated by marketers all that much. But that's the key reason why marketers can manipulate them so much."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s important to differentiate between what I call advertising, which aims to inform consumers about a company&#8217;s product, and what I call marketing, which aims to promote brand loyalty.  The first is essential, and the second has dubious benefits for the general public.</p>
<p>Advertisers often aim to create dissatisfaction, and then present their problem as a solution to this dissatisfaction.  Many television commercials primarily aim to create positive associations with the product they are marketing.  Unfortunately, more often than not, buying the product that is being marketed will not resolve your dissatisfaction.  Nor will it necessarily help you live a happier life.</p>
<p>One of the worst consequences of marketing is that it contributes to interpersonal economic competition, also known as &#8220;keeping up with the Jones&#8217;s&#8221;.  I became a little less of a libertarian yesterday when I read this article in the American Prospect:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=why_we_dont_vacation_like_the_french" rel="nofollow">http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=why_we_dont_vacation_like_the_french</a></p>
<p>I am not suggesting that we place any kind of restriction on marketing.  I am suggesting that we promote general awareness of its dangers, and promote skepticism in the general public.</p>
<p>&#8220;Perhaps the most classic example of granfalloon tactics in the commercial world is the macho designation of being either a &#8220;Chevy Man&#8221; or a &#8220;Ford Man&#8221; that the two automotive companies were happy to foster. For decades &#8212; and in many parts of the U.S. still &#8212; a key aspect of many men&#8217;s self-definition was the brand of truck they drove: Ford or Chevy.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sixwise.com/newsletters/06/06/25/people_who_drive_silver_or_blue_cars_should_not_read_this.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sixwise.com/newsletters/06/06/25/people_who_drive_silver_or_blue_cars_should_not_read_this.htm</a></p>
<p>This is just one example of the manipulative tactics used by marketers.  Marketing is a rare example of a free market occupation that does not create any wealth for the general public.  Instead, marketers capitalize on stupidity and present false solutions.  By teaching people to be wary of the influence of marketing, they will be able to make better decisions for themselves.  One more quote from Brian Vaszily:</p>
<p>&#8220;PLEASE remember the First Real Rule of Marketing &#8212; the key secret of those who seek to control your beliefs and habits in order to take your money, your votes, your time or whatever else it is they desire from you &#8212; is that nobody believes they can be manipulated by marketers all that much. But that&#8217;s the key reason why marketers can manipulate them so much.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
